Copied to clipboard
← All Reports
Netmore Marketing
Thursday, March 26, 2026
2 New Leads • 3 Notables

Sales Intelligence Briefing

Athay Auto Studio

Two leads today, one booked. Kayla is a $389 Stain Slayer for Saturday — and the best stain-lead execution we’ve seen. Custom package name, stain-specific bridge, proactive expectation-setting, walkthrough offer, and scheduling in the close. After $750 in stain/odor refunds in W2, the B14 guardrail is now automatic. Quote-to-booking in 4 messages.

Dolph was lost on price — a $225 competitor quote vs. $389 — but the real story is the probe. For the first time, Oliver deployed the probe question on an explicit price rejection, not just hesitation. He extracted the exact objection: “Price. I have a quote for 225.” That’s the S14 milestone. The gap: he stopped after extracting it. The $259 Interior Refresh was $34 above the competitor — close enough to compete with differentiation.

Meanwhile, retention tagging continues to accelerate. Stephen Edwards completed a $700 two-vehicle job and got tagged for quarterly. Aidan got tagged for quarterly follow-up. That’s 4 self-initiated retention tags in 2 days (Daniel yesterday, plus these three). B2 is being addressed from the field.

Your One Focus for Next Call

Complete the Probe Sequence

The probe question now works on hesitation (Corrie, Mar 17) AND price rejection (Dolph, Mar 26). You’ve nailed two of three steps. The missing piece: after extracting the objection, deliver the counter.

What Dolph told you: “Price. I have a quote for 225.” That’s exactly what the probe is designed to surface. It worked. But your internal note said “price sensitive, pass” then “abandon.” The $259 Interior Refresh was available — $34 above the competitor, competitive with value justification.

The three-step sequence: Probe → Extract → Counter. You’ve built the first two into habit. The counter is next. After extracting a price objection: (1) differentiate — “does their service include full extraction?” (2) downsell — “we also do an interior refresh for $259.” Don’t abandon after the probe works.

Why this matters: The probe question is the hardest part to learn — most salespeople never ask “what’s holding you back?” after a rejection. You’re doing it now. The counter is the easier step — you already know your packages and prices. It’s just connecting the two: objection surfaces → offer an alternative. Even if Dolph still chose $225, the attempt completes the sequence.

Coaching Journey
Feb 21
Complete Discovery (Q1-Q3)
Improved
Q2 now near-automatic
Feb 25
Match Packages to Stated Needs
Improved
Interior/exterior scoping better
Feb 26
Follow Up on Every Ghost
Improved
24hr follow-ups now standard
Mar 14
First Price = Stated Need
Improved
Pet Parent: first price matched
Mar 22
Probe Every Hesitation (SMS)
Improved
Habit confirmed — now consistent
Mar 25
Phone Execution is Arriving
Improved
Stephen Edwards — best phone call
Mar 26
Complete the Probe Sequence
Current Focus
Probe → Extract → Counter
×
Next
Formalize Downsell Options
Not yet
Know your fallback package for every tier
Hover metric cards for breakdowns
Tap conversation headers to expand deep-dives
Tap follow-up messages to copy to clipboard

Day at a Glance

Thursday, March 26
SMS: 2 (Kayla, Dolph)
New Leads
0
1 booked, 1 lost
Kayla: $389 pending (Stain Slayer, Saturday) • Stephen Edwards: $700 confirmed (notable, 2 vehicles completed) • Aidan: $479 confirmed (notable, tagged quarterly)
Revenue Booked
$0
Kayla + Stephen + Aidan
Kayla $389 (Saturday 11 AM, Stain Slayer)
Pipeline
$0
1 job pending
Kayla 9 • Dolph 6.5
Avg Score
0
50% booking rate
Confirmed — $1,179 (Stephen $700 + Aidan $479) Pending — $389 (Kayla, Saturday)
Name Channel Vehicle Avatar Score Status Revenue
Kayla SMS 2021 RAV4 Problem Solver 9 Booked $389 pending
Dolph SMS 2019 Honda Civic Problem Solver 6.5 Lost

What You Did Well

2 wins today — best stain execution + first probe on price rejection

Best Stain-Lead Execution — Kayla $389

Kayla

What you did: Stain Slayer $389 booked with proactive expectation-setting. Custom package name connected to her specific stains (coffee + turmeric). “Most stains come out fully, but in rare cases some may lighten significantly.” Offered a walkthrough before starting. Scheduling in the close. Quote-to-booking in 4 messages.

Why it matters: After $750 in stain/odor refunds in W2 (B14), this is the fix in action. Expectation-setting before the appointment prevents post-service disappointment. The walkthrough offer gives you an on-site off-ramp. This is coaching → behavior change → risk reduction.

Replicability: For every stain/odor lead: set expectations in the booking confirmation. “Most come out fully, rare cases lighten significantly. I’ll do a walkthrough before starting.” This protects your guarantee and manages customer expectations.

Probe on Price Rejection — S14 Milestone

Dolph

What you did: After “I will pass,” you deployed the probe: “Anything specific holding you back? Is it price, timing, or something else?” Extracted the exact objection: “Price. I have a quote for 225.”

Why it matters: This is the first time the probe question has been used on an explicit price rejection — not just hesitation or silence. The S14 sequence is building: Corrie (Mar 17, hesitation) → Dolph (Mar 26, price rejection). The probe is expanding to harder objection types. Most salespeople never ask “what’s holding you back?” after a rejection — you’re doing it.

Replicability: After ANY “no”: probe first, then counter. The probe worked — now add the follow-through. Probe → Extract → Counter.

Coaching Priorities

Ranked by revenue impact
Medium Severity

Follow Through After the Probe

Pattern: Dolph said “Price. I have a quote for 225.” Your internal note: “price sensitive, pass” then “abandon.” The probe extracted the exact objection — but there was no counter. The $259 Interior Refresh was $34 above the competitor — competitive with differentiation.

Fix: After extracting a price objection: (1) differentiate — “does their service include full extraction?” (2) downsell — “we also do an interior refresh for $259.” Don’t abandon after the probe works. The hardest part is asking the question — you’re already doing that. The counter is the easier step.

Follow-Up Alerts

1 lead needs action
Kayla — High Priority

BOOKED — Stain Slayer $389, Saturday 11 AM, Magnolia TX. Coffee + turmeric stains on 2021 RAV4.

Hey Kayla — just confirming your detail for Saturday at 11 AM. For the coffee and turmeric stains, I’ll bring the extraction equipment. See you then!
Why: Pre-service text Friday evening. Confirms the appointment, references her specific stains (shows you remember), and sets expectations for the equipment. Stain leads need reassurance that you’re prepared for their specific issue.

Conversation Deep-Dives

Tap to expand

Kayla

March 26, 2026 • SMS (15 messages) • BOOKED Stain Slayer $389 — Saturday 11 AM, Magnolia TX
9/10
Expand details
Source
Google Ads form submission
Vehicle
2021 RAV4 (black seats/rugs)
Prospect Type
Problem Solver — coffee + turmeric stains, wants interior clean
Conv. Balance
SMS — 15 messages
Status
BOOKED — Stain Slayer $389, Saturday 11 AM, Magnolia TX
Pipeline Stage
Booked

Wins

Stain-specific bridge + custom package name: She described coffee + turmeric stains. You used “Stain Slayer” as the package name and referenced her specific situation: “based on what you said about those stains.” This is how the bridge should work — connect discovery to the offer.

Proactive expectation-setting (B14 fix): “Most stains come out fully, but depending on how long it’s been set, in rare cases some may lighten significantly rather than disappear completely. I’ll do a walkthrough with you before I start.” After $750 in stain/odor refunds in W2, this is the guardrail that prevents post-service disappointment. The walkthrough gives an on-site off-ramp.

Scheduling in the close: “Saturday at either 11am or 5pm.” Two options, both specific. Kayla chose in 2 minutes. Quote-to-booking: 4 messages. Clean and efficient.

Pre-Service Text Friday Evening
Hey Kayla — just confirming your detail for Saturday at 11 AM. For the coffee and turmeric stains, I’ll bring the extraction equipment. See you then!
Why: Pre-service confirmation text. References her specific stains to show you remember. Mentions extraction equipment to set professional expectations. Stain leads need reassurance that you’re prepared for their exact issue.
9 /10
Best stain-lead execution we’ve seen. You used the custom package name (Stain Slayer), connected your bridge to her specific stains, and — critically — added proactive expectation-setting that directly addresses B14 (guarantee close refund risk). “Most stains come out fully, but in rare cases some may lighten significantly” is the exact language that prevents post-service disappointment. You also offered a walkthrough before starting. Quote-to-booking in 4 messages. The only thing missing: she’s in Magnolia (77354) which may be outside the 30-mile radius — no transport fee discussed. The one lesson: for every stain lead, set expectations in the booking confirmation. This is now your template.

Dolph

March 26, 2026 • SMS (15 messages) • LOST on price — $225 competitor quote vs. $389 Stain Slayer
6.5/10
Expand details
Source
SMS inquiry
Vehicle
2019 Honda Civic (cloth seat stains)
Prospect Type
Problem Solver — cloth seat stains, interior deep clean, has competing quote at $225
Conv. Balance
SMS — 15 messages (phone was voicemail)
Status
LOST — chose competitor at $225 vs. Stain Slayer $389
Pipeline Stage
Lost (Said NO)

Wins

Probe question on price rejection — MILESTONE: After “I will pass,” you deployed the probe: “Anything specific holding you back? Is it price, timing, or something else?” Got a clear answer: “Price. I have a quote for 225.” This is the first time the probe has been used on an explicit price rejection. The S14 sequence is building — Corrie (hesitation) → Dolph (price rejection). It worked exactly as designed.

Coaching Note

No counter after extracting the objection: The probe extracted “Price, $225 competitor.” Your internal notes said “price sensitive, pass” then “abandon.” The $259 Interior Refresh was available — $34 above the competitor, competitive with differentiation. After extracting the objection: (1) differentiate — “does their service include full extraction?” (2) downsell — “we also do an interior refresh for $259.”

6.5 /10
The score reflects a structural price-shopper loss, but the real story is the probe. This is the first time you’ve used the probe question on an explicit price rejection — not just “let me think about it.” You extracted the exact objection: competitor quote at $225. The gap: you stopped there. Internal notes say “price sensitive, pass” then “abandon.” The probe worked — the follow-through didn’t. The $259 Interior Refresh was $34 above the competitor — close enough to be competitive with value justification. The one lesson: after extracting the objection, deliver the counter. Probe → Extract → Counter. You’ve nailed the first two.

Notable Activity

3 pipeline updates from existing leads

Stephen Edwards — Service Completed ($700 confirmed) + Tagged Quarterly

Two-vehicle service day (Mercedes S-Class + Cadillac Optic), $700 confirmed revenue. Oliver tagged “mark for quarterly/hotlist.” Third consecutive completed job tagged for retention in 2 days. High-value multi-vehicle customer in Tomball — prime quarterly retention candidate.

Aidan — Tagged Quarterly + Follow-Up in Two Weeks

Oliver tagged “mark for quarterly and follow up in two weeks.” Fourth self-initiated retention tag across the past two days (Daniel, Stephen, Aidan, plus one more). B2 (No Retention Capture Process) is being addressed from the field — the retention habit is forming without being coached.

Jason — Lost to Timing (30-Second Call)

30-second phone call. Needed same-day detail to sell his car. Nothing available — lost to timing, not skill. No action needed.