Copied to clipboard
← All Reports
NETMORE MARKETING
Week 1 — Mar 1–7, 2026
Generated March 10, 2026
Weekly Sales Meta-Analysis
Athay Auto Studio

24 conversations this week, avg score 6.3/10 (up from 6.2). SMS is pulling away at 6.7 while phone stays stuck at 5.8 — the gap widened to 0.9 points. Close and hesitation handling both improved meaningfully. Critical regression: Discovery Q3 dropped from 26% to 8%. Booking rate fell to 23% with $4,727 in recoverable pipeline.

Performance Overview

Week 1, March 2026
Conversations
24
↓ 33% from 36
Avg Score
6.3
↑ 0.1 from 6.2
Booking Rate
23%
↓ 8 pts from 31%
Total Quoted
$9.2K
↓ from $12.9K
Booked Revenue
$2,077
23% of quoted
Open / Recoverable
$4,727
52% of quoted
Lost
$2,347
↑ from 17% to 26%
Booked $2,077 Open $4,727 Lost $2,347

Skill Acquisition Tracker

10 skills tracked

Acquired — Consistent Habits

SkillAdherencevs. Last Week
Opener 100% (22/22) → Stable
Discovery Q1 (Vehicle/Service) 100% (10/10) ↑ from 89%
Discovery Q2 (Condition) 90% (9/10) ↑ from 83%

Progressing — Sometimes Executes

SkillAdherencevs. Last WeekNotes
Close 57% (8/14) ↑ from 45% Crossed into PROGRESSING
Hesitation Handling 57% (4/7) ↑↑ from 38% Moved from NOT YET
Diagnosis Bridge 75% (3/4) ↑↑ from 0% Small sample
Discovery Q4 (Timeline) 67% (2/3) ↑ from 30% Small sample

Not Yet — Rarely/Never Executes

SkillAdherencevs. Last WeekNotes
Discovery Q3 (Frequency) 8% (1/13) ↓↓ REGRESSION Was 26% — went backwards
Follow-Up Sequence 25% (1/4) New tracking
Biggest Win

Hesitation handling jumped 19 percentage points (38% → 57%). Oliver is starting to engage when prospects push back instead of surrendering immediately.

Top 3 Coaching Priorities

This week's focus areas
Priority #1 — Critical Regression

Discovery Q3: "How often do you get your car detailed?"

Asked only 1 of 13 applicable conversations (8%). This was 26% last week — the target was 50%. It went the wrong direction. This is the classification question that feeds the entire Hot List rebook system. Without it, we can't separate Problem Solvers from Occasional Detailers.

Revenue at stake: ~$1,612 in invisible repeat revenue. At the Feb OD rate of 33%, ~4 of 13 open leads could be rebook candidates — but we can't identify them without Q3.

Target next week: 40%+ adherence (5+ hits out of ~13 opportunities). Lower than last week's 50% target because we need to reverse the regression before pushing higher.

Priority #2: Follow-Up / Ghost Recovery — $4,727 at Stake

Combined follow-up execution remains near zero. 13 of 24 conversations ended "Open" — the largest outcome category. Only 1 follow-up sequence initiated. Ghost recovery: 0/2. The recoverable pipeline is growing as a percentage of quoted revenue (52%, up from 40%). At 20% recovery rate, that's $945 left on the table.

Target: 3+ follow-up attempts next week (up from 1).

Priority #3: Phone Conversion — 5.8 avg (unchanged), 4 of 6 Losses

Phone is stuck at 5.8 for the second straight week while SMS climbed to 6.7. The gap widened from 0.6 to 0.9 points. More critically, 4 of 6 lost leads came through phone. Phone is 42% of volume but produces 67% of losses. New pattern: self-disqualification — Oliver refers prospects to competitors before presenting his own options.

Target: Phone avg ≥6.0, ≤2 phone losses next week.

Channel Comparison

SMS vs. Phone
SMS Average
6.7
↑ 0.3 from 6.4
14 conversations (58%)
Phone Average
5.8
→ Unchanged
10 conversations (42%)
MetricSMS (n=14)Phone (n=10)Gap
Avg Score 6.7 5.8 -0.9
Score Range 5 – 9 3 – 7.5
Booking Rate 21% (3/14) 20% (2/10) ~Even
Loss Rate 14% (2/14) 40% (4/10) Phone 3x worse

Phone share is growing

Phone increased from 28% to 42% of volume. More leads are calling instead of texting. If this trend continues, phone execution becomes even more critical — the weaker channel is getting more traffic.

Prospect Type Analysis

Avatar distribution
TypeCount%Expectedvs. Last Week
Problem Solver 21 88% 70–80% ↑ from 61%
Occasional Detailer 3 12% 15–20% ↓ from 33%
Enthusiast 0 0% 2–5% ↓ from 3%

OD data is unreliable this week

Q3 wasn't asked (8% adherence), so many prospects who might be ODs were classified as Problem Solvers by default. The drop from 33% to 12% is likely a measurement artifact, not a real shift. We can't measure what we don't ask.

Outcome by Type

TypeBookedOpenLost
Problem Solver 4 (19%) 11 (52%) 6 (29%)
Occasional Detailer 1 (33%) 2 (67%) 0 (0%)
Key Insight

ODs had a 0% loss rate — they don't say no. They either book or go quiet (recoverable). Problem Solvers are driving all the losses.

Revenue Exposure

Pipeline health
CategoryAmount% of Quotedvs. Last Week
Total Quoted $9,151 100% ↓ from $12,857
Booked $2,077 23% ↓ was 31%
Open / Recoverable $4,727 52% ↑ was 40%
Lost $2,347 26% ↑ was 17%

The conversion pipeline is leaking more

Booking rate dropped 8 points (31% → 23%). Lost rate nearly doubled (17% → 26%). The $4,727 in Open/Recoverable is the action number — these leads received pricing, didn't say no, and went silent. At 20% recovery rate: $945. At the current ghost recovery rate (0%): $0.

If close rate matched last week's 31%, ~2 more leads would have booked = ~$806 additional revenue.

Notable Conversations

Standouts and patterns

Top Performers

Sylvia — Wed 3/5, SMS, 9/10

The new benchmark. Custom "Odor Slayer" naming, deep discovery, confident pricing through "Ouch" reaction, proactive expectation setting with satisfaction guarantee. Booked $389. Only miss: Q3.

Elle — Thu 3/6, SMS, 8.5/10

Near-identical to Sylvia. The only conversation this week where Q3 was asked ("How often do you usually get it detailed?" → "Second detail ever" → confirmed Problem Solver). Custom naming, diagnosis bridge, guarantee close. Booked $389.

Common Thread

Both top performers were SMS, both were odor jobs with custom naming, both included expectation setting. Elle is the only one that asked Q3 — and it was the most complete conversation of the week. Q3 doesn't slow the conversation down — it makes it better.

Patterns in Losses

Self-Disqualification on Phone

4 of 6 losses were phone. Two showed a specific pattern: Oliver decides the prospect's problem is too hard before presenting a solution. Caller-Wireless (sap) and Crystal Leger both got referred to competitors. This is phone-specific — on SMS, Oliver has time to think through the response rather than reacting in real-time.

Week-over-Week

Feb W4 → Mar W1
MetricFeb W4Mar W1Change
Conversations 36 24 -33%
Avg Score 6.2 6.3 +0.1
SMS Avg 6.4 6.7 +0.3
Phone Avg 5.8 5.8
Booking Rate 31% 23% -8 pts
Loss Rate 8% 25% +17 pts
OD Share 33% 12% -21 pts *
Open / Recoverable $5,172 (40%) $4,727 (52%) ↑ % share
Total Quoted $12,857 $9,151 -29%

* OD share decline likely a measurement artifact from Q3 regression (8% adherence).

Weekly Sales Meta-Analysis • Athay Auto Studio • Week 1, March 2026

AI Sales Intelligence • Netmore Marketing • Growth OS